BioShock vs. Halo 3
- October 12, 2007 12:19 PM PST
- Email this!
GamePro pins two obvious Game of the Year candidates against each other. But which one emerges victorious?
It's not easy to choose between two obvious Game of the Year candidates, but in reality, not everyone can afford to buy every game out there. So we pose the question: If you had to choose, would you buy BioShock or Halo 3? We break each game down into eight categories to see who emerges victorious.
Table of Contents
Comments [2]
-
- Jump To Page:
- [ 1 ]
-
- Apr 20 2008 at 09:57:18:PM PST
-
I donno how halo 3 won the Arsenal,Innovation or Replayability.Bioshock is heaps better.
- Vote:
- Down
- Up
- +0
- report user
This is my own personal opinion, but I think Halo 3 is just straight killing, in both campaign and online. The only difference between H2 and H3 is new weapons and vehicles. I think the only reason everyone bought the game was to find out what happens in the end, which sucked, because you don't even get a definite answer. You see Master Chief in a broken ship, floating into a new planet. BOO. Bioshock has MUCH deeper game-play. There's more of a story in Bioshock. Halo 3 is nothing but killing. You have an unlimited arsenal. You can trick out weapons! You can burn people alive, or freeze them solid. You're like a super-hero with guns. Bioshock is definitely one of the best games ever.
- Vote:
- Down
- Up
- +0
- report user
-
- Jump To Page:
- [ 1 ]
